Photo of naked brunette girls

Your comments (23)

Vishura wrote 14.06.2018, 01:25: #1
You made the allegations, yet have no courage to back up your statements.

Vulkree wrote 17.06.2018, 13:45: #2
touche. I caught that afterwards, in all honesty.

Mohn wrote 21.06.2018, 18:14: #3
What about this?

Faerisar wrote 27.06.2018, 01:36: #4
"Why do Christians, especially Conservative Christians insist on violating the separation of church and state and that our country was founded on their Christian religion?"

Shakajinn wrote 06.07.2018, 19:03: #5
Hmm.... you DO know they say the same thing about YOUR experience, right?

JoJogar wrote 13.07.2018, 23:28: #6
Sincerity doesn't make it legal. Even if it was a legitimate "Ministry," tax evasion is illegal.

Shaktirisar wrote 18.07.2018, 20:51: #7
And what kind of alcohol goes best with that?

Vicage wrote 29.07.2018, 05:18: #8
Shawsy does mix it up occasionally, but I seldom see him attack someone first on this channel. GCTDVD goes straight for the personal attacks ALWAYS. That is all that he does. He keeps his attacks within the rules, but the incessant baiting of all leftie posters is all that he contributes. Never debates the topic.

Sazuru wrote 05.08.2018, 20:09: #9
i don't have to zip it, Lance.

Gular wrote 10.08.2018, 19:00: #10
"By dismissing something on the basis that it happens too far away to see directly, is too small to see directly, happened too long ago for you to have seen directly, or spans too much or too little time to observe directly, you're effectively dismissing virtually everything we consider to be scientific knowledge..."

Taule wrote 18.08.2018, 17:04: #11
Liar. I have seen your van.

Maulabar wrote 25.08.2018, 22:35: #12
What a douche.

Dour wrote 27.08.2018, 05:12: #13
As Democrats, we need to stop throwing -phobia words at people until we start winning again.

Akiktilar wrote 28.08.2018, 06:03: #14
Unfortunately, non verbalized disinterest or non-verbal behavior in the eyes of the law doesn't set a boundary to be cross in terms of harassment... It isn't until she says "not interested" or ignores his advance, and he continues, that it becomes harassment.

Mezishura wrote 04.09.2018, 07:32: #15
If you are leaning any one way, you're not agnostic

Goltibei wrote 05.09.2018, 22:11: #16
The PC's outperformed expectations, esp. in the popular vote, and the NDP under performed. What the he!! happened to that poll that had the NDP at 47% and the PC's at 33% ? That pollster should be put out of business for good. .

Zulkim wrote 07.09.2018, 05:34: #17
I thought we were referring to the USA...

Yoshura wrote 12.09.2018, 15:25: #18
Ahh, lol. Sorry, Sometimes I do some flurry typing to get my thoughts out and make a lot of mistakes.

Goltirg wrote 13.09.2018, 19:14: #19
"I have not once said the word convince in that way."

Akinorisar wrote 23.09.2018, 04:33: #20
More than just a few THEORIES have changed, but the FACTS remain. Whatever the Theory of Gravity, the FACT of gravity remains, , in exactly the same way that the FACTS of germ theory of disease remain. The "theory" of evolution, of how change happens, can and will change, but the FACT that organisms change over time, will not. Darwin didn't know a lot of science that is now common knowledge, and the THEORY of Evolution has changed very much since 1859, but not a single FACT has come to light that contradicts it in any way.

Kegul wrote 30.09.2018, 08:04: #21
Wonder who wrote that text for him.

Araramar wrote 03.10.2018, 17:39: #22
Look up against. It's pretty straight forward.

Mukree wrote 08.10.2018, 19:17: #23
I am answering the questions from only my POV, because I can not possibly answer for 'the overwhelming number of people on earth that are religious'

Comment on: